REPARATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS: A CONCEPT IN DISPUTE IN THE BRAZILIAN POLITICAL TRANSITION

R

Article authored by Eneá de Stutz e Almeida; and Camila Gomes de Lima


Published in: Access to Justice II [Electronic resource online] organization CONPEDI/UnB/UCB/IDP/UDF; Coordinators: Adriana Goulart de Sena Orsini, José Querino Tavares Neto, Mateus Eduardo Siqueira Nunes Bertoncini – Florianópolis: CONPEDI, 2016

Abstract: Reparation is considered the structural axis of the Brazilian political transition. Despite being the most consolidated pillar, it is not immune to dispute over its concept. There is an intense social and political dispute over: Who can be the beneficiary of reparation? Why and how to make reparations? Who can be held accountable? The transitional justice agenda in Brazil has contributed to broadening the concept of reparation beyond the merely economic perspective, bringing it closer to the concept of comprehensive reparation, expanding material access to justice and strengthening the protection of human rights in Brazil.

Recent Posts

Categories